Biodiversity is declining at unprecedented rates, undermining the foundations of human survival and prosperity. Healthy ecosystems provide food, clean water, and climate stability, yet a major UN assessment warns that one million species face extinction, with current extinction rates up to 1,000 times the natural rate and global vertebrate populations down 69% since 1970. Reversing this trend is central to economic resilience.
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, adopted in December 2022, aims to halt and reverse biodiversity loss. Its “30×30” goal – protecting 30% of land and ocean and restoring 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030 – seeks to strengthen climate resilience and safeguard the natural systems on which livelihoods depend. But success hinges not only on expanding protected areas; it depends on protecting conservation‑critical species.
We propose a species‑centered, data‑driven method for expanding protected areas nationally. Using over 600,000 species occurrence maps derived from Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data, we identify 242,414 critical species – endemics and species with very limited habitats – including 165,942 terrestrial and 76,472 marine species – and overlay these with the World Database on Protected Areas to quantify the protection gap.
The results show that 65.5% of critical species are currently protected, while 34.5% remain unprotected. The gap is especially large in the ocean: 57.4% of marine critical species are unprotected, compared to 23.9% of terrestrial species.
To guide cost‑effective expansion, we developed national priority templates for 138 terrestrial and 160 marine jurisdictions, iteratively selecting areas that maximize the number of newly protected species until full coverage is achieved. This enables flexible, country‑specific pathways that respect economic and political realities.
By pinpointing unprotected critical species and the areas that maximize new protections, countries can achieve high‑impact conservation with modest expansions. Globally, full protection of critical species is compatible with roughly 18.0% land and 19.9% marine protection, below the 30% ceiling, though species are unevenly distributed, and some jurisdictions will need more than 30% to achieve full coverage.
Among the unprotected critical species, 75.5% could be covered without exceeding 30% limits for jurisdictions; the remainder fall into groups (2) and (3) and would require commitments beyond the 30×30 ceiling.
This clarity supports realistic national target setting and strategic international cooperation. Protection costs vary across countries and tend to rise with income and affordability, meaning a uniform global mandate imposes unequal burdens, especially on low‑income nations. Some countries can secure large biodiversity gains with small expansions; others face steeply rising protection costs.
Consider Mexico, where a large share of unprotected marine species can be safeguarded with modest expansion before costs rise sharply. In Papua New Guinea, both terrestrial and marine protection remain relatively low‑cost up to roughly half of species coverage. These cases illustrate how countries can sequence actions: capture low‑cost, high‑gain opportunities first, then mobilize targeted finance for higher‑cost increments.
Emphasizing species coverage rather than nominal area targets reduces incentives to designate low‑biodiversity lands and ensures each hectare protected delivers measurable conservation outcomes. For developing country policymakers, this approach offers actionable templates, identifies where international finance and technical support are most needed, and focuses implementation on the greatest biodiversity returns per unit of protection.
Countries that align protection priorities with incremental species benefits can achieve far greater biodiversity outcomes than those pursuing area targets alone. To realize 30×30’s promise, global efforts should prioritize species‑focused planning, cost‑effective expansion, and equitable financing that reflects differentiated capacities, ensuring no country is left behind.
The 30×30 initiative can deliver full protection for the planet’s critical species, but success requires shifting from area‑based targets to species‑focused, cost‑effective, and equitable strategies supported by international financial cooperation.
Country‑level data on current protection percentages, numbers of unprotected endemic and restricted‑range species, and the additional area needed for full protection of these critical species can be accessed here on the Development Data Hub.
Source : World Bank
Digital design increasingly confers a competitive edge in global tech markets. This column examines how…
The novelty and speed of diffusion of generative AI means that evidence on its impact…
Much of the debate over the consequences of immigration restrictions for labour market outcomes of…
Macroeconomic models distinguish time-dependent pricing, where firms change prices at fixed intervals, from state-dependent pricing,…
Attending the World Economic Forum in Davos is costly, with estimates ranging between $20,000 and…
In many developing countries, productive firms remain too small, while less productive firms are too…