Economy

Advantages and pitfalls of green public procurement as a European strategic tool

Green public procurement supports EU climate goals but may conflict with other objectives, creating trade-offs that challenge its effectiveness.

Public procurement, or the purchasing of goods and services by governments, is among the most powerful policy tools available to the public sector. Accounting for nearly 14 percent of European Union GDP, it shapes markets, signals priorities and can in principle create demand for transformative innovation. Green public procurement (GPP), which aims to include environmental considerations in the procurement process, has been identified as an important lever to deploy public spending in line with the EU’s climate goals. In this paper, we examine GPP as a strategic tool to support the EU’s decarbonisation, industrial and geopolitical objectives, and assess it in context of the EU’s broader policy agenda.

While we acknowledge the importance of GPP in the European decarbonisation process, we argue that its widespread use might also lead to policy tensions with the EU’s other strategic objectives, such as fiscal stability and strategic autonomy. Throughout the paper, we illustrate how the interplay of these goals leads to trade-offs that are very complex to accommodate.

While procurement can empower and add financial weight to European actions aimed at achieving strategic goals, including decarbonisation, it can only be effective if the EU’s underlying strategic policy goals remain consistent with each other. Trying to fit procurement practices to multiple contrasting objectives might result in longer procurement timelines, less competition, more administrative burden and higher costs for governments. These risk hindering the effectiveness of European public administrations in delivering on the objectives, and also in their daily operations, disrupting the public administration’s purchasing practices. Finally, after having illustrated the potential benefits and pitfalls of green procurement, we discuss and evaluate several policy tools that could help the EU resolve the tensions that a widespread introduction of GPP might produce. 

Source: Bruegel

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

Our underappreciated international reserve system

The composition of international reserves is in a constant state of flux. This column identifies…

4 hours ago

CBDC neutrality, bank liquidity, and the hybrid nature of bank deposits

There are concerns that the widespread adoption of central bank digital currencies could drain bank…

4 hours ago

Beyond cost-cutting: How foundational process innovations drive sustained growth

Innovation is widely viewed as the engine of economic growth, but we know surprisingly little…

4 hours ago

Tall buildings lead to more compact and productive cities

Land-use regulations, including height limits, affect housing affordability and urban productivity. This column analyses over…

4 hours ago

Too fast to adjust: Adoption speed and the permanent cost of AI transitions

Most debate about AI and jobs still starts with the automation frontier: how many tasks…

4 hours ago

The EU’s new fiscal rules: First gaps between hopes and outcomes

The 2024 reform of the EU's Stability and Growth Pact introduced medium-term expenditure paths as…

4 hours ago