Economy

Japan seeks power to order divestment of foreign acquisitions

The step was among a raft of proposals for revisions to the Foreign Exchange ⁠and Foreign ‌Trade Act submitted on Wednesday by a finance ministry panel to relevant ministers

Japan plans to amend its foreign investment screening law ​to give authorities the power to retrospectively order foreign investors to divest acquisitions deemed to pose ⁠economic security risks.

The step was among a raft of proposals for revisions to the Foreign Exchange ⁠and Foreign ‌Trade Act submitted on Wednesday by a finance ministry panel to relevant ministers, as Japan moves to tighten foreign investment oversight, joining a global ⁠trend amid rising geopolitical tensions.

The government plans to send draft amendments to parliament later this year, marking what would, if approved, be the first major update to the law since 2019.

At present, foreign investors acquiring stakes in Japanese companies outside sectors deemed ⁠critical to economic or national security ​are not required to notify the government in advance, leaving officials with no authority to intervene.

For acquisitions by ‍investors that are categorised as particularly high risk, the panel said authorities should be allowed to order risk-mitigation ​measures or the disposal of shares if necessary.

FIVE-YEAR CAP FOR RETROSPECTIVE REVIEWS PROPOSED

The panel added that the period during which transactions can be reviewed retrospectively should be capped at around five years, citing the need to ensure legal stability for investment assets.

About half of roughly 4,000 listed Japanese firms classify themselves as operating outside sectors deemed critical to economic or national security, according to a finance ministry list.

Other proposals include subjecting domestic investors to screening if they were under the control or influence of high-risk non-residents, such as foreign governments.

The panel ⁠also said prior notifications should be required when a foreign ‌investor indirectly acquired shares in a Japanese company critical to economic or national security.

It further called for expanding the screening team, which currently has more than 60 members, ‌and for ⁠improving coordination among relevant ministries as the government moves to establish a Japanese equivalent of the U.S. ⁠Committee on Foreign Investment.

© ZAWYA

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

Immigration, innovation, and the geography of growth: Lessons from the Age of Mass Migration

US net migration turned negative in 2025 following a sharp tightening of immigration policies. This…

2 hours ago

Tariff confusion

The year 2025 was unprecedented in the frequency, complexity, and volatility of US trade policy…

2 hours ago

Monetary policy’s ‘last-mile problem’ and what can be done about it

Central banks can move policy rates, but transmission depends on households acting on them. This…

2 hours ago

What is driving the global rise in long-term interest rates?

Rising bond yields are likely down to stronger investment demand, more supply of long-duration debt…

2 hours ago

World agricultural prices and the outbreak of civil war

Falling agricultural prices have been found to generally increase armed civil conflict in producing regions,…

2 hours ago

Government support of religion strengthened religiosity and divided America

The White House Faith Office is expanding federal support for religious organisations. Can government policy…

2 hours ago