Economy

Japan seeks power to order divestment of foreign acquisitions

The step was among a raft of proposals for revisions to the Foreign Exchange ⁠and Foreign ‌Trade Act submitted on Wednesday by a finance ministry panel to relevant ministers

Japan plans to amend its foreign investment screening law ​to give authorities the power to retrospectively order foreign investors to divest acquisitions deemed to pose ⁠economic security risks.

The step was among a raft of proposals for revisions to the Foreign Exchange ⁠and Foreign ‌Trade Act submitted on Wednesday by a finance ministry panel to relevant ministers, as Japan moves to tighten foreign investment oversight, joining a global ⁠trend amid rising geopolitical tensions.

The government plans to send draft amendments to parliament later this year, marking what would, if approved, be the first major update to the law since 2019.

At present, foreign investors acquiring stakes in Japanese companies outside sectors deemed ⁠critical to economic or national security ​are not required to notify the government in advance, leaving officials with no authority to intervene.

For acquisitions by ‍investors that are categorised as particularly high risk, the panel said authorities should be allowed to order risk-mitigation ​measures or the disposal of shares if necessary.

FIVE-YEAR CAP FOR RETROSPECTIVE REVIEWS PROPOSED

The panel added that the period during which transactions can be reviewed retrospectively should be capped at around five years, citing the need to ensure legal stability for investment assets.

About half of roughly 4,000 listed Japanese firms classify themselves as operating outside sectors deemed critical to economic or national security, according to a finance ministry list.

Other proposals include subjecting domestic investors to screening if they were under the control or influence of high-risk non-residents, such as foreign governments.

The panel ⁠also said prior notifications should be required when a foreign ‌investor indirectly acquired shares in a Japanese company critical to economic or national security.

It further called for expanding the screening team, which currently has more than 60 members, ‌and for ⁠improving coordination among relevant ministries as the government moves to establish a Japanese equivalent of the U.S. ⁠Committee on Foreign Investment.

© ZAWYA

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

Letting AI agents write econometric code

Large language models increasingly write the code behind empirical research. This column reports a benchmark…

2 days ago

Never let a good crisis go to waste: Term limits and banking reforms

Financial crises routinely trigger sweeping overhauls of financial regulation, but whose interests do these reforms…

2 days ago

Is there a ‘China problem’ and how can the World Trade Organization address it?

Bilateral pushback against China is failing, making joint WTO and IMF action key to tackling…

2 days ago

Fiscal consolidation: Temporary costs versus lasting scars

Public debt is at or near record highs across the OECD, increasing the pressure on…

2 days ago

The mortality costs of climate change

Mortality is one of the most salient consequences of climate change. Existing estimates have largely…

2 days ago

The cost of job loss in carbon-intensive sectors: Evidence from Germany

In a green transition, workers will have to move from polluting, carbon-intensive sectors to other…

2 days ago