Economy

Japan seeks power to order divestment of foreign acquisitions

The step was among a raft of proposals for revisions to the Foreign Exchange ⁠and Foreign ‌Trade Act submitted on Wednesday by a finance ministry panel to relevant ministers

Japan plans to amend its foreign investment screening law ​to give authorities the power to retrospectively order foreign investors to divest acquisitions deemed to pose ⁠economic security risks.

The step was among a raft of proposals for revisions to the Foreign Exchange ⁠and Foreign ‌Trade Act submitted on Wednesday by a finance ministry panel to relevant ministers, as Japan moves to tighten foreign investment oversight, joining a global ⁠trend amid rising geopolitical tensions.

The government plans to send draft amendments to parliament later this year, marking what would, if approved, be the first major update to the law since 2019.

At present, foreign investors acquiring stakes in Japanese companies outside sectors deemed ⁠critical to economic or national security ​are not required to notify the government in advance, leaving officials with no authority to intervene.

For acquisitions by ‍investors that are categorised as particularly high risk, the panel said authorities should be allowed to order risk-mitigation ​measures or the disposal of shares if necessary.

FIVE-YEAR CAP FOR RETROSPECTIVE REVIEWS PROPOSED

The panel added that the period during which transactions can be reviewed retrospectively should be capped at around five years, citing the need to ensure legal stability for investment assets.

About half of roughly 4,000 listed Japanese firms classify themselves as operating outside sectors deemed critical to economic or national security, according to a finance ministry list.

Other proposals include subjecting domestic investors to screening if they were under the control or influence of high-risk non-residents, such as foreign governments.

The panel ⁠also said prior notifications should be required when a foreign ‌investor indirectly acquired shares in a Japanese company critical to economic or national security.

It further called for expanding the screening team, which currently has more than 60 members, ‌and for ⁠improving coordination among relevant ministries as the government moves to establish a Japanese equivalent of the U.S. ⁠Committee on Foreign Investment.

© ZAWYA

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

Similarity is not exposure: Measuring spillovers from US–China trade frictions

The redirection of Chinese exports away from the US has fuelled concerns about its spillovers…

5 days ago

Energy labels, feebates and standards: Lessons from the EU’s 2021 reform

The European Commission is simplifying the rules around the EU energy label. This column uses…

5 days ago

The Global Office: Globalisation’s frontier is shifting from factories to offices

Service value chains are expanding faster than industrial ones, yet their geography is strikingly different:…

5 days ago

When wording changes what we find: The impact of inflation expectations on spending

How households’ inflation expectations affect their spending is a central question for researchers and policymakers…

5 days ago

Invest now or pay more later: can the EU climate resilience framework break the disaster-relief cycle?

An anticipatory framework for the European Union to manage climate risks should lead to better…

5 days ago

Why generals need economists to win long wars

Military planners need to work more closely with economists to better understand resource management and…

5 days ago