Economy

Japan seeks power to order divestment of foreign acquisitions

The step was among a raft of proposals for revisions to the Foreign Exchange ⁠and Foreign ‌Trade Act submitted on Wednesday by a finance ministry panel to relevant ministers

Japan plans to amend its foreign investment screening law ​to give authorities the power to retrospectively order foreign investors to divest acquisitions deemed to pose ⁠economic security risks.

The step was among a raft of proposals for revisions to the Foreign Exchange ⁠and Foreign ‌Trade Act submitted on Wednesday by a finance ministry panel to relevant ministers, as Japan moves to tighten foreign investment oversight, joining a global ⁠trend amid rising geopolitical tensions.

The government plans to send draft amendments to parliament later this year, marking what would, if approved, be the first major update to the law since 2019.

At present, foreign investors acquiring stakes in Japanese companies outside sectors deemed ⁠critical to economic or national security ​are not required to notify the government in advance, leaving officials with no authority to intervene.

For acquisitions by ‍investors that are categorised as particularly high risk, the panel said authorities should be allowed to order risk-mitigation ​measures or the disposal of shares if necessary.

FIVE-YEAR CAP FOR RETROSPECTIVE REVIEWS PROPOSED

The panel added that the period during which transactions can be reviewed retrospectively should be capped at around five years, citing the need to ensure legal stability for investment assets.

About half of roughly 4,000 listed Japanese firms classify themselves as operating outside sectors deemed critical to economic or national security, according to a finance ministry list.

Other proposals include subjecting domestic investors to screening if they were under the control or influence of high-risk non-residents, such as foreign governments.

The panel ⁠also said prior notifications should be required when a foreign ‌investor indirectly acquired shares in a Japanese company critical to economic or national security.

It further called for expanding the screening team, which currently has more than 60 members, ‌and for ⁠improving coordination among relevant ministries as the government moves to establish a Japanese equivalent of the U.S. ⁠Committee on Foreign Investment.

© ZAWYA

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

The unequal burden of oil shocks: Labour markets and monetary policy

The war in Iran has sent oil prices sharply higher, reviving the question of who…

2 days ago

When private insurance buys faster access to public care

Supplemental private health insurance is becoming more common in universal healthcare systems as a way…

2 days ago

Pension funds, unlisted firms, and Europe’s Capital Markets Union

Europe's Capital Markets Union debate is again centred on how to turn savings into productive…

2 days ago

Increasing employment in pre-retirement years slows cognitive decline

Dementia affects an estimated 6 million Americans. This column uses data from the Health and…

2 days ago

The right balance: how to fix European Union artificial intelligence regulation

EU AI regulation should trade lower ex-ante burden for robust ex-post monitoring, judicial review and…

2 days ago

When oil is scarce and debt is binding: policy sequencing under a severe energy supply shock

With inflation still binding and fiscal space thin, the 2026 Iran shock revives the case…

2 days ago