Economy

Geopolitical shifts and their economic impacts on Europe: Short-term risks, medium-term scenarios and policy choices

Over the last decade, Europe has suffered from the decay of the post-war international order, economic coercion from both China and the United States, and aggression from Russia. This contribution puts these changes into a historical context, examines their short-term consequences, develops scenarios for 2030-2035 and uses these to draw out the policy implications for the next one to five years.

The short-term output impact of tariff and policy uncertainty since the beginning of the second Trump Presidency is expected to be moderate. However, Europe faces very high risks. Plausible short-term dangers include: a collapse of the US bond market; escalation of Russian military aggression against Ukraine or the European Union directly; a fiscal crisis triggered by a populist election victory in a high-debt euro-area member; or a trade shock triggered by increasing tensions between the US and China and/or hostile Chinese actions in East Asia.

We develop three benchmark scenarios for the world in 2035, all of which involve continued US-China rivalry and greater multipolarity than in the past:

  1. A further retreat from, or dismantling of, international cooperation, with continuing protectionism in the US and minimal global public goods.
  2. A three-bloc world involving China- and US-led blocs alongside a non-aligned set of countries, with the provision of international public goods within, and partially  between blocs.
  3. A new multilateral order, with international cooperation over the provision of global public goods.

Actual outcomes could consist of combinations of these scenarios or variants of them. Scenario 1 would be least desirable for the EU, most countries individually and countries collectively, while scenario 3 would be most desirable. In scenario 2, Europe’s decision to align with the US or to choose non-alignment would depend on whether the US acts in a benevolent or coercive manner.

Short-to medium term policy must both prepare Europe for adverse future scenarios and contribute to greater international stability and cooperation. This requires policies that increase Europe’s strategic autonomy from the two superpowers, both for its protection and to increase its bargaining power. The policy focus should include much greater defence, tech and financial autonomy from the US, a far more resilient and integrated energy system, secure access to critical minerals and a fiscal framework that gives greater flexibility to low-risk countries. Internationally, Europe should defend and promote the reform of the rules-based international order by forming coalitions with other countries from the Global North and some from the Global South. The two priority areas should be trade policy and climate policy. 

Source : Bruegel

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

AI feedback loops and the conditions for explosive growth

If frontier AI models can be used to develop their next models, this may lead…

4 hours ago

The scramble for critical minerals: An old curse in a new world

Lithium, cobalt, nickel, copper, and rare earth elements are reshaping global trade and great-power politics…

4 hours ago

Japan’s productivity transformation: From within-firm stagnation to market-driven reallocation

Discussions on Japan’s ‘lost decades’ have long focused on sluggish demand and the survival of…

5 hours ago

How the rise of AI matters for fiscal policy

Predictions of the effects of AI on the economy and society tend to focus on…

5 hours ago

The anatomy of job polarisation: Evidence from four decades of French worker flows

Employment polarisation – the decline of middle-skill routine occupations relative to both ends of the…

5 hours ago

Expanding opportunities: Economics PhD placement in the 21st century

Since 2010, a growing proportion of doctoral graduates have been taking jobs outside academia. This…

5 hours ago