Economy

Advantages and pitfalls of green public procurement as a European strategic tool

Green public procurement supports EU climate goals but may conflict with other objectives, creating trade-offs that challenge its effectiveness.

Public procurement, or the purchasing of goods and services by governments, is among the most powerful policy tools available to the public sector. Accounting for nearly 14 percent of European Union GDP, it shapes markets, signals priorities and can in principle create demand for transformative innovation. Green public procurement (GPP), which aims to include environmental considerations in the procurement process, has been identified as an important lever to deploy public spending in line with the EU’s climate goals. In this paper, we examine GPP as a strategic tool to support the EU’s decarbonisation, industrial and geopolitical objectives, and assess it in context of the EU’s broader policy agenda.

While we acknowledge the importance of GPP in the European decarbonisation process, we argue that its widespread use might also lead to policy tensions with the EU’s other strategic objectives, such as fiscal stability and strategic autonomy. Throughout the paper, we illustrate how the interplay of these goals leads to trade-offs that are very complex to accommodate.

While procurement can empower and add financial weight to European actions aimed at achieving strategic goals, including decarbonisation, it can only be effective if the EU’s underlying strategic policy goals remain consistent with each other. Trying to fit procurement practices to multiple contrasting objectives might result in longer procurement timelines, less competition, more administrative burden and higher costs for governments. These risk hindering the effectiveness of European public administrations in delivering on the objectives, and also in their daily operations, disrupting the public administration’s purchasing practices. Finally, after having illustrated the potential benefits and pitfalls of green procurement, we discuss and evaluate several policy tools that could help the EU resolve the tensions that a widespread introduction of GPP might produce. 

Source: Bruegel

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

Anatomy of a rise: Monetary policy and the post-Covid surge in long-term interest rates

The sharp rise in long-term interest rates since 2020 is difficult to explain from slow-moving…

15 hours ago

Beyond trade diversion: How the US-China trade war reshaped global production

Trade wars do not simply redirect exports; they also reshape the costs of production, disrupt…

15 hours ago

Why we spend so much time in meetings

Few features of modern work are as widely criticised as meetings. Using data from over…

15 hours ago

New jobs in 140 years of data: Why the AI displacement fear is overstated — and what to worry about instead

Forecasts of AI-driven job destruction rest on counting automatable tasks. But labour markets hire, pay,…

15 hours ago

Fiscal unsustainability and capture: $40 trillion Treasury debt does not measure the risks; enhanced long-term repurchases don’t improve them

US federal government debt exceeded $40 trillion in August 2026, triggering concerns about fiscal credibility…

15 hours ago

How exchange rate policy reshapes global supply chains and productivity growth

Global current account imbalances are widening again. This column argues that currency undervaluation, supported by…

15 hours ago