Trade weaponisation is straining WTO rules, but a semiconductor pact could show how to manage security risks.
To promote their economic security, or simply to inflict damage on other nations, countries are increasingly weaponising trade policy. To do so, trading nations must sidestep the rules-based system established in the aftermath of the Second World War because this system, in letter and spirit, opposes such behaviour. However, neglecting the rules-based system leads to uncertainty, and uncertainty incentivises trading nations to intensify their pursuit of national economic security, thus undermining the multilateral edifice even more.
It does not have to be this way, however. Based on an analysis of trade in semiconductors (a product market in which there is clear weaponisation of trade policy), we argue that, while a comprehensive negotiation on economic security may be currently unrealistic, a sectoral agreement within the World Trade Organization would be both feasible and appropriate, and could provide a template for regulating economic security. Such an agreement should include non-discriminatory trade in high-end semiconductors and a negotiated list of segments of the covered product market, in which signatories will be allowed to erect barriers to protect economic/national security without being obliged to compensate affected parties.
Source : Bruegel
Europe pays for innovative medicines through 27 uncoordinated national negotiations, generating access delays, cross-country pricing…
The EU's fiscal rules in force since 2024 are often criticised for their complexity. The…
The signing of the EU-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) in January 2026 represents a significant…
More EU debt will not lower public borrowing costs or deepen markets without fiscal-union features,…
Rice feeds nearly 690 million people across Southeast Asia. For decades, governments across the region…
The EU Recovery and Resilience Facility was launched to support post-Covid recovery while accelerating structural…