Climate

Implementing the EU Nature Restoration Law: exploring pathways for member states

The European Union Nature Restoration Law (NRL) entered into force in 2024. The NRL sets quantitative restoration targets aimed at improving natural habitats that are currently in poor condition, with substantial leeway for countries to choose implementation pathways that fit their priorities.

This Working Paper examines three pathways: (1) evenly spreading restoration efforts across all ecosystems; (2) prioritising cost-efficiency; and (3) maximising carbon sequestration. Each approach yields vastly different outcomes. This paper provides insights into the trade-offs.

For countries seeking to minimise costs in the short run, an 81 percent reduction in costs over the period 2025-2030 is possible compared to a baseline scenario of an even restoration of all ecosystems. Countries that aim to maximise carbon sequestration benefits can achieve a 54 percent increase in climate impact over the same period. However, the different pathways converge after 2040. Prioritising cost minimisation in the early years could lead to higher costs later if delays in investment in the more costly restoration projects allow habitats to continue to degrade.

Maximising cost-efficient carbon sequestration is possible, allowing relatively low investment costs and high sequestration. Countries should adopt a holistic approach to pathway selection, considering the full spectrum of ecological and societal gains alongside climate mitigation.

Land ownership is an important factor that shapes feasible and effective pathways. In countries such as Spain and Germany, where private entities own substantial shares of agricultural and forest lands, policies should incentivise private investment, including through norms, subsidies or pricing mechanisms. Countries with substantial public landholdings, such as the Netherlands, may find it easier to implement direct restoration projects. These structural differences will influence the cost and pace of restoration and also the design of policies and governance mechanisms to ensure compliance with NRL targets.

Source : Bruegel

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

The future is under the glass

Digital design increasingly confers a competitive edge in global tech markets. This column examines how…

18 hours ago

Generative AI in German firms: Diffusion, costs, and expected economic effects

The novelty and speed of diffusion of generative AI means that evidence on its impact…

18 hours ago

Immigration restrictions and natives’ intergenerational mobility: Evidence from the 1920s US quota acts

Much of the debate over the consequences of immigration restrictions for labour market outcomes of…

18 hours ago

Why inflation may respond faster to big shocks: The rise of state-dependent pricing

Macroeconomic models distinguish time-dependent pricing, where firms change prices at fixed intervals, from state-dependent pricing,…

18 hours ago

Showing up in the Alps: The economic value of Davos

Attending the World Economic Forum in Davos is costly, with estimates ranging between $20,000 and…

19 hours ago

Productivity, firm size, and why distortions hurt developing economies

In many developing countries, productive firms remain too small, while less productive firms are too…

19 hours ago