Economy

Global economy’s ‘sugar rush’ defies trade drama – for now

Investment banks and institutions generally expect the United States to avoid a recession this year and the global economy to keep growing

For all the drama surrounding U.S. President Donald Trump’s trade tariffs, the world economy is holding up better than many had expected.

The latest data from the United States, China and, to a lesser extent, Europe are showing resilience and the global economy as a whole is still expected to grow modestly this year.

This is in part due to U.S. buyers and foreign sellers bringing forward business while many of the import duties unveiled by U.S. President Donald Trump remain suspended.

While that effect may prove short-lived, Trump’s decision to pause tariffs and some glimpses of progress in trade talks, particularly between the United States and the European Union, have fuelled cautious optimism.

“We are seeing a bit of a sugar rush in industry, with manufacturers bringing forward production and trade,” said Holger Schmieding, an economist at investment bank Berenberg.

“The other thing is that we have evidence that Trump pedalled back on tariffs. The bet in markets and to some extent in the economy is that he barks but doesn’t bite.”

Investment banks and institutions generally expect the United States to avoid a recession this year and the global economy to keep growing.

The International Monetary Fund downgraded its global GDP growth forecast by just 0.5 percentage points last month to 2.8%.

This is roughly in line with the trend over the past decade and a far cry from the downturns experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2008 financial crisis or even the turmoil that followed the 9/11 terror attacks in 2001.

No one is venturing a prediction on where the trade negotiations will eventually settle, particularly with a U.S. president who sees himself as unstoppable.

This week alone, separate U.S. courts first blocked and then reinstated Trump’s tariffs – creating a degree of legal uncertainty that will do little to facilitate trade deals between the United States and those threatened with the levies.

While the EU celebrated “new impetus” in its trade talks with the United States, negotiations with China were “a bit stalled” according to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

Companies are counting the cost of the ongoing impasse.

A Reuters analysis of corporate disclosures shows Trump’s trade war had cost companies more than $34 billion in lost sales and higher costs, a toll that is expected to rise as ongoing uncertainty over tariffs paralyses decision making at some of the world’s largest companies.

Car-makers from Japan’s Toyota to Germany’s Porsche and Mercedes-Benz are bracing for lower, or lower-than-previously expected profits if they have not given up making predictions altogether, like Volvo Cars and Dutch-based Stellantis.

This is likely to result in a hit especially for Japan. The United States is Japan’s biggest export destination, accounting for 21 trillion yen ($146.16 billion) worth of goods, with automobiles representing roughly 28% of the total.

“While the worst shocks may be over, there’s still a lot up in the air,” Xingchen Yu, a strategist at UBS’s Chief Investment Office, said. “We don’t really know what a new normal for tariffs would look like, unfortunately.”

PAYBACK

But so far the global economy has held up pretty well.

China’s output and exports are resilient as its companies re-route trade to the United States via third countries.

Even in Europe, manufacturing activity was at a 33-month high in May, rebounding from a slump induced by more expensive fuel following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Confidence was also buttressed by the prospect of greater fiscal spending in Germany, a missing ingredient for European growth for the past couple of decades.

The robustness of the world economy has surprised even professional forecasters. A measure produced by U.S. bank Citi that tracks the degree to which global economic data has surprised to the upside is now at its highest in more than a year.

Some of that strength circles back to the tariffs themselves and the attempts by U.S. households and businesses to front-load purchases to beat anticipated price increases later this year.

U.S. imports were up around 30% in March from where they were in October.

The risk to the upbeat outlook comes from the expected “payback” of those advance purchases, which are unlikely to be repeated and will mean slower activity – in the U.S. and elsewhere – later.

Economists still fear a triple whammy in which the front-loaded boost to the goods sector is unwound while U.S. household purchasing power is squeezed by higher prices and companies put off investment and hiring.

At the margin, however, this scenario is starting to appear a little less likely after Trump’s pause on tariffs.

“The balance has slightly shifted towards more optimism, albeit with uncertainty and volatility,” ING’s global head of macro Carsten Brzeski said.

© ZAWYA 2025

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

The future is under the glass

Digital design increasingly confers a competitive edge in global tech markets. This column examines how…

20 hours ago

Generative AI in German firms: Diffusion, costs, and expected economic effects

The novelty and speed of diffusion of generative AI means that evidence on its impact…

20 hours ago

Immigration restrictions and natives’ intergenerational mobility: Evidence from the 1920s US quota acts

Much of the debate over the consequences of immigration restrictions for labour market outcomes of…

20 hours ago

Why inflation may respond faster to big shocks: The rise of state-dependent pricing

Macroeconomic models distinguish time-dependent pricing, where firms change prices at fixed intervals, from state-dependent pricing,…

20 hours ago

Showing up in the Alps: The economic value of Davos

Attending the World Economic Forum in Davos is costly, with estimates ranging between $20,000 and…

20 hours ago

Productivity, firm size, and why distortions hurt developing economies

In many developing countries, productive firms remain too small, while less productive firms are too…

20 hours ago