Innovation

Europe has a solid basis for battery and electric vehicle manufacturing growth

Europe is successfully building up battery and EV manufacturing capacity, though mainly thanks to foreign investment.

Batteries and electric vehicles (EVs) contribute to Europe’s energy security, climate policy and industrial strategy. Stationary batteries help to stabilise electricity grids, while EV adoption helps reduce reliance on imported oil and reduces the one-sixth of global carbon dioxide emissions from road transport. The two technologies accounted for two-thirds of the $700 billion global clean technology market in 2023, showing their relative importance compared to other cleantech (IEA, 2024). In the United States, for which comprehensive data is available, investment in battery and electric vehicle manufacturing outstrip other clean-tech investment.

The European Union is using policy to shape domestic battery and EV markets. Rules limiting the average fleet-wide carbon emissions from new cars and vans (Regulation (EU) 2019/631) have increased the incentives for manufacturers to supply and market electric vehicles, boosting uptake. Significant fiscal support at national and European levels has been used to attract battery and EV manufacturing investment. Meanwhile, the EU has imposed tariffs on Chinese-produced EVs, while European EVs now face higher US tariffs. 

Battery and EV investments therefore show how an industrial transformation is unfolding alongside the clean energy transition. Figure 1 shows these investments since 2017, with bubble sizes proportionate to the value of investments. Since January 2017, we estimate that companies have invested €38 billion in European battery manufacturing facilities and a further €34 billion in electric vehicle facilities (Bruegel, 2025).

This analysis addresses three questions. First, what have investments delivered in terms of battery and EV manufacturing capacity and how does that compare with domestic demand? Second, who owns these facilities and how important has foreign investment been? Third, how are investments distributed across Europe and how has this changed over the past eight years?

What has €72 billion in investment delivered?

Each investment is tied to an annual manufacturing capacity: numbers of EVs that can be assembled, or, for batteries, cell fabrication and battery pack assembly stages. As of September 2025, we estimate that European factories had the capacity to produce 4.6 million electric vehicles (including pure battery and plug-in hybrid) and 251 gigawatt hours (GWh) of battery cells annually. This compares to 2024 annual demand of 2.3 million electric vehicles and 410 GWh of batteries, of which roughly 90 percent are for EVs and the remainder are stationary batteries. Factories in Europe thus have the capacity to produce twice as many EVs as domestic demand, and to meet approximately two-thirds of domestic battery cell demand (Figure 2). 

A proper evaluation of investments should cover not only delivered capacities but also the utilisation of this capacity. Such analysis is complicated because production data is closely guarded by industry. Trade data offers an approximation of production. On a net basis, the EU imports batteries and exports electric vehicles (Figure 3). In 2024, net exports of EVs from the EU were worth €14 billion, while net imports of batteries amounted to €17 billion. 

The main destinations for EU exports of EVs over the past five years have been the United Kingdom (one-third of all exports) and the US (one-fifth). Exports to Türkiye have been rising and reached 10 percent of EU EV exports in 2025, while Norway and Switzerland receive around 9 percent and 6 percent, respectively. The EU’s position as a net exporter of EVs is threatened by the August 2025 EU-US joint agreement which set a 15 percent tariff on US vehicle imports. EV exports to the US dropped substantially, by almost 40 percent, in July-September 2025 compared to the same period in 2024.

Who owns Europe’s manufacturing facilities? 

Foreign direct investment, particularly from South Korea, has been crucial for building EU battery manufacturing capacity. Three companies (LG Energy, SK Innovation and Samsung SDI) were early innovators in lithium-ion technologies and today own four-fifths of operational battery cell manufacturing capacity in Europe (Figure 4). LG Energy, with European Investment Bank support, built Europe’s largest battery cell manufacturing facility in Wrocław, Poland, with 86 GWh or 35 percent of the continent’s capacity. SK Innovation began construction of the €1.6 billion Iváncsa (Hungary) facility in March 2022, and Samsung SDI has invested over €1.5 billion into the Göd (Hungary) facility since 2016.

While South Korean investment has slowed recently, substantial Chinese investment is arriving. Most notably, in May 2025, CATL, a Chinese company and the largest car battery producer worldwide, began construction in Debrecen (Hungary) of what may become Europe’s largest battery cell facility with a potential capacity of 100 GWh/year and investment reaching €7.3 billion.

The EU has tried to develop home-grown battery champions. Northvolt’s €4 billion investment in Skellefteå (Sweden), launched in late 2018, secured a $5 billion loan backed by the European and Nordic Investment Banks to expand the site – still the largest green loan ever raised in Europe. While Northvolt subsequently declared bankruptcy (Tagliapietra and Trasi, 2024), the 16 GWh Skellefteå plant began operations and is being sold to US firm Lyten. France is home to the two other European-owned operational battery cell facilities. Verkor operates an 8 GWh facility in Dunkirk, while the Automotive Cells Company joint venture runs a 13 GWh plant in Douvrin. Further projects are under construction by PowerCo (a Volkswagen subsidiary) and Volvo, with the latter at time of writing searching for a new partner to complete its Gothenburg (Sweden) facility, following Northvolt’s collapse.

For electric vehicles, foreign companies are less dominant. Established European automakers, including Volkswagen, BMW, Renault and Stellantis, own most EV capacity, partly because many investments involve retrofitting or expanding existing factories (Figure 5). In 2020, Volkswagen completed the €1.2 billion conversion of its Zwickau (Germany) facility to produce only electric models and began a €1 billion electric retrofit of its Emden (Germany) plant.

The largest single EV investment in Europe is the €5.8 billion by Tesla in their facility in Grünheide (Germany), where construction began in January 2020. The facility has the capacity to assemble 375,000 EVs annually. Chinese company BYD is building a €4 billion facility in Debrecen (Hungary), with an expected annual capacity of 150,000 once complete.

Is Europe’s industrial map shifting? 

Overall, since 2017, Germany has attracted the largest volume and number of investments in EVs and batteries in Europe. However, in 2025, Hungary and Spain are Europe’s leading investment destinations (Figure 6).

Investment in Hungary comes predominantly from Chinese companies. This includes the CATL €7.3 billion battery cell and BYD €4 billion EV investments mentioned above, but also Eve Energy (€950 million, battery cell) and EcoPro (cathodes, €700 million).

Whilst CATL has announced a joint venture with Stellantis to invest over €4 billion in a battery plant in Zaragoza, ongoing investments in Spain are not driven by Chinese companies but rather the Volkswagen Group. In 2023, Volkswagen subsidiary PowerCo began construction of a potentially 40 GWh battery cell plant in Sagunto, near Valencia. Volkswagen itself is investing €1 billion to prepare its Navarre facility for EV production. Meanwhile Seat, another Volkswagen subsidiary, is investing €3 billion in its Pamplona plant to prepare for further EV production.

Poland and Hungary are currently neck-and-neck leading in battery cell production capacity. Together they account for over two-thirds of European capacity. While LG is expanding its Polish facility, Chinese investment in Hungary means the country is on course to become Europe’s leading battery manufacturer. Germany is far ahead of any other European country in terms of EV capacity, with Spain and France ranking next. 

Success so far – and keeping it that way

The EU now boasts a solid industrial base for the manufacturing of both batteries and EVs. This base can already meet a large part of domestic battery demand, and the EU has become a net exporter of EVs. 

EU vehicle CO2 limits have been crucial for establishing stable demand expectations. Any proposal to weaken the EU’s 2035 deadline for CO2 limits to reach zero should be rejected by European governments and the European Parliament. This weakening would unfairly penalise companies that have already invested billions of euros into EV and battery production and would discourage future investment. It would impede the core objective of the Clean Industrial Deal – the European Commission’s plan to marry decarbonisation and economic competitiveness – and harm the long-term competitiveness of the EU car industry. It would also seriously undermine Europe’s reputation as a global climate leader. The rapid cancellation of projects in the US following the dismantling of policies that supported battery and EV investments throughout 2025 offers a warning. 

Foreign investment has been responsible for most battery investment, initially from Korean companies but today increasingly from China. The construction of these plants has created European jobs and longer value chains by enabling investment by European companies in downstream EV facilities. Continued openness to foreign investment is important for battery supply chains and for other clean technologies.

While Europe has healthy battery and EV manufacturing capacities today, demand for both will increase and additional supply will be needed. Since 2022, there has been a shift in manufacturing investment away from Germany and towards Hungary and Spain. The energy transition involves a restructuring of manufacturing supply chains, and it is inevitable that some industrial relocation will be economically efficient. Policy should embrace rather than fight this.

Source : Bruegel

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

Crypto carry: Market segmentation and price distortions in digital asset markets

The rapid growth of cryptocurrency markets has created new challenges for financial regulators and policymakers.…

6 hours ago

Macroeconomic impacts of defence spending

Worsened security in Europe has prompted EU member states to increase their defence capacity. This…

6 hours ago

Tariffs and technological hegemony

The Trump administration’s sweeping tariff measures are intended to increase the competitiveness of US firms…

6 hours ago

Harnessing the wisdom of the crowds for OECD recession predictions

A key challenge in predicting recessions is distinguishing which factors matter at different forecasting horizons…

6 hours ago

Fact-checking reduces the circulation of misinformation – we should not get rid of it

Fact-checking has emerged as one of the most prominent policy tools to combat the spread…

6 hours ago

Stifling or scaling: Acquisitions and their effect on start-up innovation

Over the past two decades, start-ups have increasingly turned to acquisition as their preferred exit…

6 hours ago