Economy

Advantages and pitfalls of green public procurement as a European strategic tool

Green public procurement supports EU climate goals but may conflict with other objectives, creating trade-offs that challenge its effectiveness.

Public procurement, or the purchasing of goods and services by governments, is among the most powerful policy tools available to the public sector. Accounting for nearly 14 percent of European Union GDP, it shapes markets, signals priorities and can in principle create demand for transformative innovation. Green public procurement (GPP), which aims to include environmental considerations in the procurement process, has been identified as an important lever to deploy public spending in line with the EU’s climate goals. In this paper, we examine GPP as a strategic tool to support the EU’s decarbonisation, industrial and geopolitical objectives, and assess it in context of the EU’s broader policy agenda.

While we acknowledge the importance of GPP in the European decarbonisation process, we argue that its widespread use might also lead to policy tensions with the EU’s other strategic objectives, such as fiscal stability and strategic autonomy. Throughout the paper, we illustrate how the interplay of these goals leads to trade-offs that are very complex to accommodate.

While procurement can empower and add financial weight to European actions aimed at achieving strategic goals, including decarbonisation, it can only be effective if the EU’s underlying strategic policy goals remain consistent with each other. Trying to fit procurement practices to multiple contrasting objectives might result in longer procurement timelines, less competition, more administrative burden and higher costs for governments. These risk hindering the effectiveness of European public administrations in delivering on the objectives, and also in their daily operations, disrupting the public administration’s purchasing practices. Finally, after having illustrated the potential benefits and pitfalls of green procurement, we discuss and evaluate several policy tools that could help the EU resolve the tensions that a widespread introduction of GPP might produce. 

Source: Bruegel

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

Rebuilding the world order: Two strategies for a fragmented world

As the postwar international order fragments and universal agreement becomes increasingly elusive, policymakers face a…

3 hours ago

Occupational licensing across countries: New evidence from 44 nations

Occupational licensing has attracted growing attention in advanced economies, yet little has been known about…

3 hours ago

Dollar erosion: The macroeconomic consequences of losing reserve currency status

The dollar's role as the world's reserve currency has been blamed for an overvalued exchange…

3 hours ago

How oil price shocks redraw the map of conflict

Oil price shocks do not simply make conflict more likely everywhere; they change where violence…

3 hours ago

Place-based industrial policies in the long run

There is growing evidence that place-based industrial policies lead to positive economic effects. This column…

3 hours ago

IMF strategy chief urges countries to maintain price stability

Christian Mumssen, the fund's new director of ​strategy, cited a rapid succession of major shocks…

5 days ago