Economy

Advantages and pitfalls of green public procurement as a European strategic tool

Green public procurement supports EU climate goals but may conflict with other objectives, creating trade-offs that challenge its effectiveness.

Public procurement, or the purchasing of goods and services by governments, is among the most powerful policy tools available to the public sector. Accounting for nearly 14 percent of European Union GDP, it shapes markets, signals priorities and can in principle create demand for transformative innovation. Green public procurement (GPP), which aims to include environmental considerations in the procurement process, has been identified as an important lever to deploy public spending in line with the EU’s climate goals. In this paper, we examine GPP as a strategic tool to support the EU’s decarbonisation, industrial and geopolitical objectives, and assess it in context of the EU’s broader policy agenda.

While we acknowledge the importance of GPP in the European decarbonisation process, we argue that its widespread use might also lead to policy tensions with the EU’s other strategic objectives, such as fiscal stability and strategic autonomy. Throughout the paper, we illustrate how the interplay of these goals leads to trade-offs that are very complex to accommodate.

While procurement can empower and add financial weight to European actions aimed at achieving strategic goals, including decarbonisation, it can only be effective if the EU’s underlying strategic policy goals remain consistent with each other. Trying to fit procurement practices to multiple contrasting objectives might result in longer procurement timelines, less competition, more administrative burden and higher costs for governments. These risk hindering the effectiveness of European public administrations in delivering on the objectives, and also in their daily operations, disrupting the public administration’s purchasing practices. Finally, after having illustrated the potential benefits and pitfalls of green procurement, we discuss and evaluate several policy tools that could help the EU resolve the tensions that a widespread introduction of GPP might produce. 

Source: Bruegel

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

Finance 4.0 and Finance Transformation Summit

The Finance 4.0 and Finance Transformation Summit is an international gathering of CFOs, finance leaders,…

11 hours ago

Investing in the future: ensuring women-led small businesses can thrive

When we picture engines of economic growth and job creation, we tend to think of…

1 day ago

From Strategic Investment to Tangible Results: Notable examples from the Human Capital Trust Fund

Two-thirds of the income gap between developed and developing countries can be attributed to disparities…

1 day ago

Precious metals retreat from record highs

Precious metal prices declined in 2026Q2 (q/q) after 14 consecutive months of gains through February,…

2 days ago

Microfinance’s promise was oversold, not broken

The Wall Street Journal recently published a sobering account of microfinance's shortcomings, documenting troubling cases…

2 days ago

Hedging interest rate risk when it matters: Evidence from Italian banks

Valuation losses can build quickly in response to higher interest rates, as demonstrated by the…

2 days ago