Economy

Advantages and pitfalls of green public procurement as a European strategic tool

Green public procurement supports EU climate goals but may conflict with other objectives, creating trade-offs that challenge its effectiveness.

Public procurement, or the purchasing of goods and services by governments, is among the most powerful policy tools available to the public sector. Accounting for nearly 14 percent of European Union GDP, it shapes markets, signals priorities and can in principle create demand for transformative innovation. Green public procurement (GPP), which aims to include environmental considerations in the procurement process, has been identified as an important lever to deploy public spending in line with the EU’s climate goals. In this paper, we examine GPP as a strategic tool to support the EU’s decarbonisation, industrial and geopolitical objectives, and assess it in context of the EU’s broader policy agenda.

While we acknowledge the importance of GPP in the European decarbonisation process, we argue that its widespread use might also lead to policy tensions with the EU’s other strategic objectives, such as fiscal stability and strategic autonomy. Throughout the paper, we illustrate how the interplay of these goals leads to trade-offs that are very complex to accommodate.

While procurement can empower and add financial weight to European actions aimed at achieving strategic goals, including decarbonisation, it can only be effective if the EU’s underlying strategic policy goals remain consistent with each other. Trying to fit procurement practices to multiple contrasting objectives might result in longer procurement timelines, less competition, more administrative burden and higher costs for governments. These risk hindering the effectiveness of European public administrations in delivering on the objectives, and also in their daily operations, disrupting the public administration’s purchasing practices. Finally, after having illustrated the potential benefits and pitfalls of green procurement, we discuss and evaluate several policy tools that could help the EU resolve the tensions that a widespread introduction of GPP might produce. 

Source: Bruegel

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

The growing impact of political risk on financial markets

Risk associated with broad political changes can be quantified with a globally priced factor common…

2 days ago

When public money multiplies, and when it does not: A guide to the catalytic effect of blended finance

Achieving sustainable development goals needs blended finance, where public money is used to crowd in…

2 days ago

Geopolitical oil price shocks: Why these shocks hit harderGeopolitical oil price shocks: Why these shocks hit harder

When geopolitical crises strike, oil prices often surge, with consequences that extend far beyond energy…

2 days ago

Why liquidity evaporates when it is most needed

A common feature of flash crash episodes in financial markets is that liquidity vanishes precisely…

2 days ago

Using global shocks as a laboratory to study executive pay

It is often claimed that executives reap rewards from favourable market tailwinds they did nothing…

2 days ago

When privacy protects but excludes: The hidden costs of data restrictions in digital lending

Privacy regulations empower consumers, but they can also cut off credit for the populations that…

2 days ago