Trade weaponisation is straining WTO rules, but a semiconductor pact could show how to manage security risks.
To promote their economic security, or simply to inflict damage on other nations, countries are increasingly weaponising trade policy. To do so, trading nations must sidestep the rules-based system established in the aftermath of the Second World War because this system, in letter and spirit, opposes such behaviour. However, neglecting the rules-based system leads to uncertainty, and uncertainty incentivises trading nations to intensify their pursuit of national economic security, thus undermining the multilateral edifice even more.
It does not have to be this way, however. Based on an analysis of trade in semiconductors (a product market in which there is clear weaponisation of trade policy), we argue that, while a comprehensive negotiation on economic security may be currently unrealistic, a sectoral agreement within the World Trade Organization would be both feasible and appropriate, and could provide a template for regulating economic security. Such an agreement should include non-discriminatory trade in high-end semiconductors and a negotiated list of segments of the covered product market, in which signatories will be allowed to erect barriers to protect economic/national security without being obliged to compensate affected parties.
Source : Bruegel
Taiwan has not passed on most of the rising costs to consumers, and it heavily…
Only 13% of companies were on track with their AI initiatives, as regulatory hurdles and…
The European Securities and Markets Authority said on Wednesday that European regulators should be given…
Oil prices fell 1% on Thursday as recovering crude exports from the Gulf and a…
Whether teaching a cognitive skill remains valuable in this era of AI is a crucial…
China's trade surplus is widening, its manufactured exports are surging, and the political backlash is…