Trade weaponisation is straining WTO rules, but a semiconductor pact could show how to manage security risks.
To promote their economic security, or simply to inflict damage on other nations, countries are increasingly weaponising trade policy. To do so, trading nations must sidestep the rules-based system established in the aftermath of the Second World War because this system, in letter and spirit, opposes such behaviour. However, neglecting the rules-based system leads to uncertainty, and uncertainty incentivises trading nations to intensify their pursuit of national economic security, thus undermining the multilateral edifice even more.
It does not have to be this way, however. Based on an analysis of trade in semiconductors (a product market in which there is clear weaponisation of trade policy), we argue that, while a comprehensive negotiation on economic security may be currently unrealistic, a sectoral agreement within the World Trade Organization would be both feasible and appropriate, and could provide a template for regulating economic security. Such an agreement should include non-discriminatory trade in high-end semiconductors and a negotiated list of segments of the covered product market, in which signatories will be allowed to erect barriers to protect economic/national security without being obliged to compensate affected parties.
Source : Bruegel
The redirection of Chinese exports away from the US has fuelled concerns about its spillovers…
The European Commission is simplifying the rules around the EU energy label. This column uses…
Service value chains are expanding faster than industrial ones, yet their geography is strikingly different:…
How households’ inflation expectations affect their spending is a central question for researchers and policymakers…
An anticipatory framework for the European Union to manage climate risks should lead to better…
Military planners need to work more closely with economists to better understand resource management and…