World

Which companies are ahead in frontier innovation on critical technologies? Comparing China, the European Union and the United States

Competition in critical technologies is attracting increasing attention not only because of the foundational nature of these technologies for other types of innovation, but also because of their role in the United States national security strategy. In this paper, we look into which entities in China, the European Union and the US innovate at the technology frontier in the three most important critical technologies – artificial intelligence, quantum computing and semiconductors – based on identification of the most radical novel patents in these technologies and their subsectors. Working with these pathbreaking patents, we look into the origin of the companies that file the largest numbers of them. US innovators dominate the innovation frontier for quantum computing and, to a lesser extent, AI, with Chinese innovators doing better in semiconductors. European innovators lag in all, but perform relatively better in quantum computing, in which they rank similarly to Chinese innovators. Furthermore, the innovation ecosystem is quite different across geographies. In the US, tech companies top the rankings of critical novelties and are highly concentrated: as many as three companies are in the top rankings of all of the three critical technologies. Frontier innovators in the field in which the EU competes most equally – quantum – are mostly research centres and not companies. China lies somewhat in between in all three domains.

For more on comparing frontier innovation in China, the US and the EU, also read the Working Paper ‘Radical novelties in critical technologies and spillovers: how do China, the US and the EU fare?’.

This is an output of China Horizons, Bruegel’s contribution in the project Dealing with a resurgent China (DWARC). This project has received funding from the European Union’s HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions under grant agreement No. 101061700.

Source : Bruegel

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

Anatomy of a rise: Monetary policy and the post-Covid surge in long-term interest rates

The sharp rise in long-term interest rates since 2020 is difficult to explain from slow-moving…

1 day ago

Beyond trade diversion: How the US-China trade war reshaped global production

Trade wars do not simply redirect exports; they also reshape the costs of production, disrupt…

1 day ago

Why we spend so much time in meetings

Few features of modern work are as widely criticised as meetings. Using data from over…

1 day ago

New jobs in 140 years of data: Why the AI displacement fear is overstated — and what to worry about instead

Forecasts of AI-driven job destruction rest on counting automatable tasks. But labour markets hire, pay,…

1 day ago

Fiscal unsustainability and capture: $40 trillion Treasury debt does not measure the risks; enhanced long-term repurchases don’t improve them

US federal government debt exceeded $40 trillion in August 2026, triggering concerns about fiscal credibility…

1 day ago

How exchange rate policy reshapes global supply chains and productivity growth

Global current account imbalances are widening again. This column argues that currency undervaluation, supported by…

1 day ago