World

Which companies are ahead in frontier innovation on critical technologies? Comparing China, the European Union and the United States

Competition in critical technologies is attracting increasing attention not only because of the foundational nature of these technologies for other types of innovation, but also because of their role in the United States national security strategy. In this paper, we look into which entities in China, the European Union and the US innovate at the technology frontier in the three most important critical technologies – artificial intelligence, quantum computing and semiconductors – based on identification of the most radical novel patents in these technologies and their subsectors. Working with these pathbreaking patents, we look into the origin of the companies that file the largest numbers of them. US innovators dominate the innovation frontier for quantum computing and, to a lesser extent, AI, with Chinese innovators doing better in semiconductors. European innovators lag in all, but perform relatively better in quantum computing, in which they rank similarly to Chinese innovators. Furthermore, the innovation ecosystem is quite different across geographies. In the US, tech companies top the rankings of critical novelties and are highly concentrated: as many as three companies are in the top rankings of all of the three critical technologies. Frontier innovators in the field in which the EU competes most equally – quantum – are mostly research centres and not companies. China lies somewhat in between in all three domains.

For more on comparing frontier innovation in China, the US and the EU, also read the Working Paper ‘Radical novelties in critical technologies and spillovers: how do China, the US and the EU fare?’.

This is an output of China Horizons, Bruegel’s contribution in the project Dealing with a resurgent China (DWARC). This project has received funding from the European Union’s HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions under grant agreement No. 101061700.

Source : Bruegel

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

What to do about energy sector reforms when governance incentives are the problem?

In countries where electricity outages and “load shedding” are a regular feature of life and…

3 days ago

Sector-targeted Skills Development as Industrial Policy

Today’s blog is a background note I prepared for a forthcoming Policy Research Report on…

3 days ago

How AI and machine learning can predict and explain social risks for more effective development operations

At the time when the Government of South Africa approached the World Bank’s Disaster Risk Financing…

3 days ago

Middle East institutional investors to increase allocations in private markets

US asset manager Nuveen indicates investors are looking for diversification outside of developed markets. Middle…

3 days ago

Mapping the contours of Chinese policy transmission at home and abroad

China’s place within international trade networks and global supply chains makes the propagation of Chinese…

3 days ago

From AI investment to GDP growth: An ecosystem view

Forecasts on the economic impacts of artificial intelligence diverge sharply. This column assesses how the…

3 days ago