Climate

Implementing the EU Nature Restoration Law: exploring pathways for member states

The European Union Nature Restoration Law (NRL) entered into force in 2024. The NRL sets quantitative restoration targets aimed at improving natural habitats that are currently in poor condition, with substantial leeway for countries to choose implementation pathways that fit their priorities.

This Working Paper examines three pathways: (1) evenly spreading restoration efforts across all ecosystems; (2) prioritising cost-efficiency; and (3) maximising carbon sequestration. Each approach yields vastly different outcomes. This paper provides insights into the trade-offs.

For countries seeking to minimise costs in the short run, an 81 percent reduction in costs over the period 2025-2030 is possible compared to a baseline scenario of an even restoration of all ecosystems. Countries that aim to maximise carbon sequestration benefits can achieve a 54 percent increase in climate impact over the same period. However, the different pathways converge after 2040. Prioritising cost minimisation in the early years could lead to higher costs later if delays in investment in the more costly restoration projects allow habitats to continue to degrade.

Maximising cost-efficient carbon sequestration is possible, allowing relatively low investment costs and high sequestration. Countries should adopt a holistic approach to pathway selection, considering the full spectrum of ecological and societal gains alongside climate mitigation.

Land ownership is an important factor that shapes feasible and effective pathways. In countries such as Spain and Germany, where private entities own substantial shares of agricultural and forest lands, policies should incentivise private investment, including through norms, subsidies or pricing mechanisms. Countries with substantial public landholdings, such as the Netherlands, may find it easier to implement direct restoration projects. These structural differences will influence the cost and pace of restoration and also the design of policies and governance mechanisms to ensure compliance with NRL targets.

Source : Bruegel

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

The macroeconomic impact of the Recovery and Resilience Facility: An analysis for Italy, Spain, and Greece

The EU Recovery and Resilience Facility was launched to support post-Covid recovery while accelerating structural…

11 hours ago

Climate fairness, economic development, and Europe’s responsibility

The idea of equal cumulative emissions per person is simple: every individual should have an…

11 hours ago

Mapping the world’s building regulations: new platform for smarter reforms

Every year, the world adds floor space equivalent to a city the size of Paris…

1 day ago

How large current account imbalances unwind: Evidence from historical adjustment episodes

Global imbalances are back in the policy debate. This column examines 70 current account adjustment…

2 days ago

Trapped at home: Climate stress is more likely to immobilise the poor than to move them

Climate-driven displacement is widely expected to push millions across international borders. Drawing on monthly bilateral…

2 days ago

Innovation without borders

Europe has devoted substantial resources to fostering innovation and AI diffusion, through both centralised EU…

3 days ago