Featured

EU faces complaint over plan to simplify more environmental laws

 Environmental campaign groups lodged a complaint against the European Commission on Tuesday, accusing the EU executive of moving ​ahead with an overhaul of water protection and management laws without enough evidence.

The ‌complaint is the latest by environmental groups over the European Union’s efforts to simplify and scale back policies, a strategy known as the EU “omnibus”, which responds to complaints from industries who say burdensome laws hurt ​their competitiveness with global rivals like the U.S. and China.

The complaint concerns a ​Commission plan to revise the EU’s main water legislation this year, in ⁠part in response to concerns by mining and metals companies that say the law’s ​environmental safeguards are delaying permits for new critical raw materials mines and other industrial projects.

In ​a complaint filed with the European Ombudsman — the EU’s independent watchdog — the World Wildlife Fund, the European Environmental Bureau and three other groups said the Commission had failed to sufficiently gather evidence and consult ​stakeholders before announcing the planned revision.

This failure amounted to maladministration, they said.

“Their cumulative effect amounts ​to a flagrant deviation from established due process, one that materially affects citizens’ rights,” the NGOs said. ‌They ⁠argued that the EU water laws are not the reason new mines struggle to get permits, and do not need revising.

A Commission spokesperson said it had not yet been notified of the complaint, but that it would continue to engage with stakeholders as it prepares ​to revise the water ​laws.

“The Commission has ⁠been engaging in a transparent and inclusive dialogue with member states and stakeholders, and is currently assessing the input from stakeholders,” the spokesperson said.

The ​Ombudsman will now decide whether to open an inquiry into the ​complaint. That process ⁠can take a few weeks, a spokesperson for the watchdog told Reuters.

The EU watchdog does not have enforcement powers, but rather makes recommendations that can affect future EU lawmaking, and increases ⁠scrutiny ​of the Commission.

Last year, the Ombudsman obliged the Commission ​to publicly explain why it had fast-tracked other proposals to curb sustainability laws, and not assessed whether the changes complied ​with Europe’s climate change commitments.

Source : Reuters

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

Similarity is not exposure: Measuring spillovers from US–China trade frictions

The redirection of Chinese exports away from the US has fuelled concerns about its spillovers…

1 day ago

Energy labels, feebates and standards: Lessons from the EU’s 2021 reform

The European Commission is simplifying the rules around the EU energy label. This column uses…

1 day ago

The Global Office: Globalisation’s frontier is shifting from factories to offices

Service value chains are expanding faster than industrial ones, yet their geography is strikingly different:…

1 day ago

When wording changes what we find: The impact of inflation expectations on spending

How households’ inflation expectations affect their spending is a central question for researchers and policymakers…

1 day ago

Invest now or pay more later: can the EU climate resilience framework break the disaster-relief cycle?

An anticipatory framework for the European Union to manage climate risks should lead to better…

1 day ago

Why generals need economists to win long wars

Military planners need to work more closely with economists to better understand resource management and…

1 day ago