Categories: FinanceWorld

Exclusive: U.S. regulator seeks sale of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank portfolios, sources say

 The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has retained advisers to sell the securities portfolios that the new owners of failed Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank rejected, according to people familiar with the matter.

The portfolios are comprised of low-yielding assets, such as Treasuries and U.S. government agency-backed securities, that the two regional banks amassed while interest rates were close to zero.

If First Citizens Bancshares Inc, the new owner of Silicon Valley Bank, or New York Community Bancorp Inc, which acquired Signature Bank, had assumed the assets, they would have had to realize losses given that interest rates are now much higher than the yield of these assets.

Silicon Valley Bank’s and Signature Bank’s securities portfolios carry a face value of around $90 billion and $26 billion, respectively, according to regulatory filings and statements by government officials.

The sources spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss confidential information about the sale process. The FDIC declined to comment.

It is unclear how much the FDIC’s deposit fund stands to lose on the sale of the portfolios. The fund, used to guarantee deposits at failed lenders, is replenished by a levy on all U.S. banks that are members of the FDIC’s deposit insurance scheme.

The FDIC estimates the sale of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank will cost the deposit fund $20 billion and $2.5 billion, respectively. It will release final figures once sales of the loan books of the banks and their securities portfolios are complete.

Some of the loans were passed on to First Citizens and New York Community with backstops from the FDIC, while others are up for sale separately. The FDIC has hired Newmark Group Inc to sell about $60 billion of Signature Bank’s loans it retained, Reuters reported this week.

Silicon Valley Bank gave a sense of the potential losses in its securities portfolio on March 8, two days before it failed, when it sold $21.5 billion of it to meet customer withdrawals, realizing a $1.8 billion loss. The portfolio was yielding an average 1.79%, far below the 10-year Treasury yield that at the time was around 3.9%.

Source : Reuters

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

Trump’s mortgage-backed bond purchases not moving needle on housing costs

Experts say $200bln bond-buying effort unlikely to significantly lower housing costs.  There's scant evidence so…

7 hours ago

Trump tariff shift calms European bond market

That has helped ⁠at least to put a floor under euro zone bond prices. Euro…

7 hours ago

Vision 2030 projects may drive corporate loans by Saudi banks to $75bln in 2026

Bank profitability will remain strong this year despite lower interest rates, says S&P. Saudi banks…

7 hours ago

Europe’s emissions trading system is an ally, not an enemy, of industrial competitiveness

The 2026 review of the EU ETS must be anchored in facts and focus on…

7 hours ago

How the Fed makes decisions: Disagreement, beliefs, and the power of the Chair

Federal Open Market Committee statements typically sound unanimous, but the Committee’s internal debates rarely are.…

7 hours ago

Femicides, anti-violence centres, and policy targeting

Local responses to gender-based violence, with femicide as its most extreme form, remain uneven across…

7 hours ago