Categories: LifestyleTechnology

Employer perspectives on employee work location: collaboration, culture and control

This paper discusses employers’ experience of working fully remotely during the pandemic, and their approaches to returning to the office following the pandemic. We chose to focus on the point of view of the employer since it is relatively less explored; much more is available and written on the views and opinions of employees about remote work and return to office.

To understand the employer’s perspective, we reviewed existing research evidence, and carried out eleven structured interviews with corporate leaders about their experiences with remote, in-office and hybrid work. 

Our literature review suggests that remote work does not have negative effects on performance. Similarly, the small sample of employers we interviewed experienced very strong company and employee performance while operating their businesses fully remotely. All employers we interviewed are implementing a hybrid return-to-office policy, although the specifics of the policies are different for each company. No employer was returning to full in-office work. 

We focused our literature review and interviews on the impact of remote work on employee collaboration, firm culture and manager control, which we call ‘the 3 Cs’. We found that leaders maintain a belief that employee collaboration is negatively impacted by remote work, but the evidence to support this assumption is mixed. Firm culture is often cited by employers as an important rationale for bringing employees back to the office, but the research evidence and our interviewees suggest that the notion of culture is vague and the idea that better culture is supported by in-office work is not supported by any data. Finally, the shift to remote work caused corporate leaders and front-line managers to worry about effectively managing employees they couldn’t see every day. We found that companies did not widely begin implementing employee monitoring systems in lieu of onsite management. Our interviews suggest that much learning remains to transition managers and leaders to effectively managing remote or hybrid employees and teams.

This was produced within the project ‘Future of Work and Inclusive Growth in Europe’ with the financial support of the Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth.

Source

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

Safe debt financing: International spillovers and the benefits of fiscal policy coordination

Safe government bonds enjoy a discount known as the convenience yield. When a government issues…

3 hours ago

The world is urbanizing fast — the window to get it right is narrowing

The most important urban decisions of this century are being made right now, mostly in…

3 hours ago

When aging meets digital & AI: Closing the silver digital divide for an aging world

We are living through two megatrends humanity has never seen before. The first is aging.…

3 hours ago

Tracking the changing role of foreign direct investment and remittances—check the latest WDI data

For decades, foreign direct investment (FDI) was seen as the primary engine of development finance.…

3 hours ago

Automation does not lower the labour share

The rapid diffusion of generative AI has revived fears that a new wave of automation…

1 day ago

When political pressure trumps academic freedom

Academic freedom has been declining over the past decade across the world. This column analyses…

1 day ago