Featured

Eleven countries demand EU weakens deforestation law further, document shows

 The European Union is facing further pressure from member countries to delay and weaken its upcoming law to restrict deforestation, with 11 governments demanding changes, a document seen by Reuters showed.

The world-first policy aims to end the 10% of global deforestation fuelled by EU consumption of imported soy, beef, palm oil and other products, but has become a politically contested part of Europe’s green agenda.

The EU already delayed its launch by a year to Dec. 2025, following complaints from trading partners including Brazil and the U.S., and cut back reporting rules after industry criticism. Last week, the Commission said it would spare the vast majority of countries the strictest checks.

A group of 11 countries, led by Austria and Luxembourg, has demanded the European Commission simplify the rules further, and urged delaying its application date again.

“The requirements imposed on farmers and foresters remain high, if not impossible to implement. They are disproportionate to the regulation’s objective,” the countries said in a paper, which EU agriculture ministers will discuss in Brussels on Monday.

Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Finland, Italy, Latvia, Portugal, Romania and Slovenia also signed the paper.

From December, the EU policy would require operators placing soy, beef, palm oil, cocoa, coffee and other goods onto the EU market, to provide due diligence statements proving the commodities did not fuel deforestation.

Due diligence requirements would also apply to EU exports, making countries worried about the impact on their own industries.

Companies could face penalties of up to 4% of their EU turnover for non-compliance.

The governments proposed amendments including creating a new class of countries deemed to have very low risk of deforestation, which would be exempt from customs checks and tracking the origin of goods.

A Commission spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Source : Reuters

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

The growing impact of political risk on financial markets

Risk associated with broad political changes can be quantified with a globally priced factor common…

2 days ago

When public money multiplies, and when it does not: A guide to the catalytic effect of blended finance

Achieving sustainable development goals needs blended finance, where public money is used to crowd in…

2 days ago

Geopolitical oil price shocks: Why these shocks hit harderGeopolitical oil price shocks: Why these shocks hit harder

When geopolitical crises strike, oil prices often surge, with consequences that extend far beyond energy…

2 days ago

Why liquidity evaporates when it is most needed

A common feature of flash crash episodes in financial markets is that liquidity vanishes precisely…

2 days ago

Using global shocks as a laboratory to study executive pay

It is often claimed that executives reap rewards from favourable market tailwinds they did nothing…

2 days ago

When privacy protects but excludes: The hidden costs of data restrictions in digital lending

Privacy regulations empower consumers, but they can also cut off credit for the populations that…

2 days ago