World

Elements of an Eventual Russia-Ukraine Armistice and the Prospect for Regional Stability in Europe

As the Russia-Ukraine war approaches its third year, this paper suggests possible arrangements to end the fighting and restore regional stability that could represent the “least-bad” outcome under far-from-ideal circumstances. While the prospects for immediate talks seem dim today, it is important to consider the content of such arrangements now so policymakers can be prepared when the time comes.

The prospects for peace between Russia and Ukraine are dim. The violence seems as if it might grind on forever. Russia’s September 2022 annexation of Ukrainian territory, much of which the Russian military does not even control, seems almost calculated to ensure that no negotiation can succeed. Ukraine has accordingly turned its back on the offer made early in the war to pursue neutrality and instead requested a fast-track NATO membership, a longstanding Russian red line, making it more difficult to conceive of any compromise that could satisfy both sides.

But the war in Ukraine will end. Military victory remains a possibility, but the challenges both sides have faced with offensive operations imply that the war will probably end through some sort of negotiation. Any agreements that emerge from those talks could have, for better or for worse, significant implications for the regional order in Europe. It is therefore also important to consider how various parties might build on negotiations over settling the current war to stabilize the regional order.…

The remainder of this commentary is available at stimson.org.


Samuel Charap is a senior political scientist at the RAND Corporation. His research interests include the foreign policies of Russia and the former Soviet states; European and Eurasian regional security; and U.S.-Russia deterrence, strategic stability, and arms control. Jeremy Shapiro is the research director of the European Council on Foreign Relations. His areas of focus include U.S. foreign policy and transatlantic relations.

This commentary originally appeared on Stimson on December 14, 2023. Commentary gives RAND researchers a platform to convey insights based on their professional expertise and often on their peer-reviewed research and analysis.

Source : rand.org

GLOBAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MAGAZINE

Recent Posts

An autopsy of the voluntary carbon market

The voluntary carbon market was built on a single promise: that one credit cancels one…

3 hours ago

Macroprudential policy may curb innovation – but instrument choice matters

Macroprudential policy is designed to make the financial system safer, but it can also reshape…

4 hours ago

Revisiting immigration’s effect on US wages and employment

Anti-immigration policies often rest on the premise that immigrants worsen native-born employment and wages. This…

4 hours ago

Japan’s productivity transformation: From within-firm stagnation to market-driven reallocation

Discussions on Japan’s ‘lost decades’ have long focused on sluggish demand and the survival of…

4 hours ago

The scramble for critical minerals: An old curse in a new world

Lithium, cobalt, nickel, copper, and rare earth elements are reshaping global trade and great-power politics…

4 hours ago

AI feedback loops and the conditions for explosive growth

If frontier AI models can be used to develop their next models, this may lead…

2 days ago