The European Union will need in the coming years to invest a substantial amount of resources in European public goods (EPGs), including for the digital and climate transitions, and for defence and security. Funding for this could be provided in a centralised way at EU level, via either a fund or from the EU budget, but for this to be politically viable, and to create the necessary trust, national budgetary policies need to comply with the common EU fiscal rules. Setting adequate conditions for access to central financing is, however, not straightforward. The tightness of the conditionality needs to balance the desirability of a country pursuing sound fiscal policies with the need to deliver on the provision of EPGs that benefit several or all EU countries. The optimal tightness should reassure fiscally-conservative countries that EU money would not result in opportunistic behaviour that results in less discipline at national level. More fiscally fragile countries should be reassured that their fiscal retrenchment efforts will be duly rewarded.
Source : bruegel
European defence ministries and intelligence services run on infrastructure they do not control and cannot…
The fiscal dominance view holds that politically captured central banks are more likely to be…
Generative AI now writes a substantial share of the world's code, but aggregate software output…
As women gain political ground around the world, there is hope that the election of…
As tensions rise between major powers and the global trading system becomes more contested, policymakers…
Private capital markets have expanded rapidly, but access remains concentrated among wealthy investors. This column…